Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

335 Or. App. 243

State v. Hansen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 25, 2024

This page is marked noindex.

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2024-09-25

Applies OR 137 § 137.128 · OR 164 § 164.043

Remanded for resentencing · Decided 2024-09-25

No. 680            September 25, 2024                 243

   This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
    pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
         except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
                  STATE OF OREGON

                 STATE OF OREGON,
                 Plaintiff-Respondent,
                           v.
             DARCIE NOELLE HANSEN,
                 Defendant-Appellant.
            Washington County Circuit Court
                 21CR62037; A180748

  Theodore E. Sims, Judge.
  Submitted August 9, 2024.
  Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and Anna R. Johnson, Deputy Public Defender,
Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for
appellant.
   Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
Solicitor General, and Leigh A. Salmon, Assistant Attorney
General, filed the brief for respondent.
  Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
  LAGESEN, C. J.
  Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
244                                          State v. Hansen

        LAGESEN, C. J.
         After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of theft
in the third degree, ORS 164.043. The trial court sentenced
defendant to 18 months of bench probation and ordered
her to perform 36 hours of community service. Defendant
argues that the trial court plainly erred in imposing the
community service obligation. The state concedes the error.
We agree and remand for resentencing.
         ORS 137.128(1) provides that, before a court can
order a defendant to complete community service as a condition of probation, the defendant “must consent to donate
labor for the welfare of the public.” Failure to obtain such
consent is reversible error. State v. Uppiano, 
315 Or App 474, 475
, 
498 P3d 356
 (2021); State v. Everitt, 
247 Or App 619, 620
, 
269 P3d 117
, rev den, 
352 Or 265
 (2012).
         The record shows that the trial court failed to obtain
defendant’s consent before imposing community service as a
condition of probation. In light of the state’s concession, and
taking into account the interests of the parties, the gravity
of the error, and the ends of justice, we exercise our discretion to correct the trial court’s plain error.
        Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

/335/orapp/243 · .json · Public domain