In re Steimle

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 31, 1949

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1949-05-31

Cited by 3 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1949

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Marshall v. Louisiana · Hurd v. Hodge · Ex parte Betz

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1949-05-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Treating the application in this case as a motion for leave to file, a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied.

¶2The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Burton

¶3are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, § 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789 (1947); Brandt v. United States, 333 U. S. 836 (1948); In re Eichel, 333 U. S. 865 (1948); Everett v. Truman, 334 U. S. 824 (1948).

¶4Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge

¶5are of the opinion that argument should be heard on the motion for leave to file the petition in order to settle what remedy, if any, the petitioner has. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.