Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 U.S. 585 - Ruark v. Colorado

Ruark v. Colorado’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
June 1986
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 4 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1986 · most notably Garrison v. State of Louisiana (1964), Freedman v. Maryland (1965)

25 federal appellate · 4 district · 22 state decisions

550196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · Smith v. Crouse · Etchieson v. Texas · Smith v. Crouse · Pea v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. [People of State of] California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.