155 U.S. 54
Docket No. 2,
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1894-10-22
<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.</p>
2 counsel of record
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1894-10-22
Cited by 29 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1955 · most notably Murphy v. Utter (1902), Utter v. Franklin (1899)
8 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
¶2Mr. Andrew M. Todd for appellant.
¶3Mr. B. F. Lee for appellee.
¶5delivered the opinion of the court. This was a suit against the defendant Beggs as maker of the engine used by Yuengling, and is disposed of by .the opinion in the last case holding the Wright patent to be invalid. The decree of the court below dismissing the bill is, therefore,
¶6Affirmed.