17 U.S. 84 - The Experiment — 17 U.S. 84

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1979

1 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1(practice.)

¶2' Depositions, taken on farther proof, in one prize cause, cannot be in - voked into another.

¶3Appeal from the Circuit Court of Massachusetts.

¶4This was a question of collusive capture.

¶5The Attorney General moved to invoke into this cause depositions taken, on farther proof, in the case of the George, reported ante, vol. I. p. 408.

¶6Mr. Chief Justice Marshall.

¶7Original evidence and depositions taken on the standing interrogatories, may be invoked from one prize cause into another. But depositions taken as farther proof in one cause, cannot be used in another.

¶8Motion refused.a

¶9But in other respects, cases of collusive and joint captures form an exception to the general rules of evidence in prize causes. In cases of this nature, the usual simplicity of the prize proceedings is departed from, because the standing interrogatories are more peculiarly directed to the question of prize or no prize, as between the captor and captured, and are not adapted to the determination of questions of joint or collusive capture. It is, therefore, almost a matter of course to permit the introduction of farther proof in these cases. The George, ante, vol. l.p 408. But this farther proof must be of such a nature as is admissible by the general rules of prize *85evidence. Under what circumstances these rules permit the invocation of papers and depositions, may be seen, ante, rol. II. Jlppendix, note I. p. 23.