¶1The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Van Sycicel, Brown, Sims, Smith. 11.
¶3For reversal — None.
57 N.J.L. 201
Berry v. Potter
Decided June 15, 1894
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1894-06-15
<p>On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of Supreme Court, see 27 Vroom 454.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1952
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1894-06-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →