587 Pa. 1
896 A.2d 1191
Decided May 2, 2006
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2006-05-02
Relies on Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer · Commonwealth v. Uderra
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-05-02
Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Commonwealth v. Spotz (2011), Commonwealth v. Steele (2008)
4 federal appellate · 109 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1concurs.
¶2I join the majority opinion in all but one facet. With respect to the analysis of Appellant’s claim alleging discrimination in jury selection on the basis of gender, I join in the views expressed by Mr. Justice Saylor in his Concurring and Dissenting Opinion and Mr. Justice Castille in his Concurring Opinion regarding the application of our recent decision in Commonwealth v. Uderra, 580 Pa. 492, 862 A.2d 74 (2004) to this issue.