¶1The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
¶2*586For affirmance—The Chancellor, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Van Syokel, Barkalow, Bogert,. Dayton, Hendrickson, Krueger, Nixon. 12.
¶3For reversal—None.
59 N.J.L. 585
Decided November 15, 1896
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1896-11-15
<p>On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 29 Vroom 423.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1954
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1896-11-15