Fulton v. Goord’s Empirical Analysis
591 F.3d 37 · 2009
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12133 (§ 203 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Kentucky v. Graham · Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn. · International Primate Protection League v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o state a prima facie discrimination claim under either the ADA or the Rehabilitation Act, ... [a plaintiff] must allege: '(1) that he is a qualified individual with a disability; (2) that he was excluded from participation in a public entity's services, programs or activities or was otherwise discriminated against by a public entity; and (3) that such exclusion or discrimination was due to his disability.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A qualified individual with a disability is defined as a disabled person who, whether or not given an accommodation, 'meets the essential eligibility requirements for the receipt of services or the participation in programs or activities provided by a public entity.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The “irreducible constitutional minimum of standing,” rooted in Article Ill’s ease- or-controversy requirement, consists of three elements: (1) an “injury in fact,” by which is meant “an invasion of a legally protected interest”; (2) “a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of’; and (3) a likelihood that “the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision.” Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) (internal quotation marks omitted).... Accordingly, “standing is gauged by the specific common-law, statutory or constitutional claims that a party presents.” Int’l Primate Prot. League v. Adm’rs of Tulane Educ. Fund, 500 U.S. 72, 77 , 111 S.Ct. 1700 , 114 L.Ed.2d 134 (1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.