Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

659 F.2d 73

Docket No. 81-7168

United States v. Jackson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 15, 1981.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1981-10-15

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Saldana · United States v. Broussard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1981-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2014

18 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Summary Calendar.

¶2N. P. Callahan, Jr., Birmingham, Ala. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

¶3Holly L. Wiseman, G. Douglas Jones, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶4Before HILL, VANCE and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM:

¶7Appellant Henry De William Jackson, Jr. pleaded guilty to a charge of air piracy in United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama. The plea was in connection with the 1972 hijacking, by appellant and two confederates, of a domestic Southern Airways’ jet. During the incident, the hijackers commanded the jet to more than 10 cities and two foreign countries and eventually ordered landing in Cuba but only after wounding the jet’s co-pilot and extracting $2 million in ransom money.

¶8Appellant was incarcerated in Cuba from 1972 until 1980, when he was returned to the United States. He complains on this direct appeal that the United States did not, with sufficient vigor, negotiate for his extradition. We do not reach *74this issue, for it is clear under our authorities that appellant, through his voluntary guilty plea, has waived his objection on this ground. “The issue of the right to a speedy trial is non-jurisdictional in nature .... A guilty plea, since it admits all the elements of a formal criminal charge, waives all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings against a defendant.” United States v. Saldana, 505 F.2d 628, 629 (5th Cir. 1974) (summary calendar) (citations omitted). See also United States v. Broussard, 645 F.2d 504, 505 (5th Cir. 1981) (summary calendar). Furthermore, it is clear from the record that appellant’s guilty plea was unconditional.

¶9AFFIRMED.

/659/f2d/73 · .json · Public domain