Hoopes v. Basic Co.

Decided February 22, 1907

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1907-02-22

. At the start the question was raised whether either of the complainants was qualified under our statute to bring this suit. Held: that such a person, holding a claim for unliquidated damages, is qualified as a creditor to be the actor in the suit; that does not follow.

Decided 1907-02-22

Per Curiam.

¶1The decree, in this ease is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

*434For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayzb, Reed, Trenci-iard, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—14.For reversal—None.