Kamrin v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
725 F.2d 1225 · 1984
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Quinn v. Robinson (1986), Martin v. Warden, Atlanta Pen (1993)
35 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3184 · 18 U.S.C. § 3282
Relies on Cole v. United States · Smith v. Crouse · Charles Neely v. William Henkel · Bertman v. J a Kirsch Co · Holmes v. Laird
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to use such remedies and recourses as are provided by the law of the requested party”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'cannot complain if required to submit to such modes of trial ... as the laws of that country may prescribe for its own people, unless a different mode be provided for by treaty.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“underl[y] United States statutes of limitations,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.