Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 F.3d 372

Docket No. 95-7858.

Deane v. Huffman

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: January 18, 1996. Decided: February 8, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-08

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Nestor G. Gonzales v. Ellis B. Wright

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-02-08

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Roland Maceo Deane, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Deane v. Huffman, No. CA-94-497-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/76/f3d/372 · .json · Public domain