Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 F.3d 372

Docket No. 95-2963.

In Re: Chris J. Eubanks

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 18, 1996. Decided Jan. 31, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-01-31

Relies on Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · In re United Steelworkers of America · Nestor G. Gonzales v. Ellis B. Wright

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-01-31

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Chris J. Eubanks petitions this court for a writ of mandamus pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 21, requesting that we direct a district court judge to enter a default judgment against the Defendants in Eubanks's pending civil rights action.

¶2

Mandamus is an extraordinary writ that should be granted only in unusual circumstances not present here. Kerr v. United States District Court, 426 U.S. 394 (1976). Further, it cannot be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979). Accordingly, we deny Eubanks's petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3

PETITION DENIED.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

/76/f3d/372 · .json · Public domain