Haddad v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12133 (§ 203 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396N (§ 1915 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville · Tommy Olmstead Commissioner Georgia Department of Human Resourcess v. L C Jonathan Zimring
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here, Defendants have elected to provide the services that Plaintiff requests through the TBI/SCI Waiver program. Having done so, they must provide them in accordance with the ADA’s anti-discrimination mandate. Therefore, if Plaintiff is entitled to Medicaid services and is otherwise qualified for, desires, and requires TBI/SCI Waiver services in order to avoid unnecessary institutionalization, the ADA may, indeed, require Defendants to provide Plaintiff with such services if doing so would not result in a fundamental alteration of its programs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Title II of the ADA provides that no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[m]andatory preliminary relief, which goes well beyond simply maintaining the status quo[,] is particularly disfavored, and should not be issued unless the facts and law clearly favor the moving party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.