Chatman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Edwards · 728 So. 2d 1153 - Lindley v. State · Ex Parte Burnett · Burnett v. State · Burnett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`As in Ex parte Edwards, and Ex parte Burnett , the indictment in the instant case did not charge a mental state, and is, therefore, fatally defective with respect to the vehicular-homicide charge. ... Because there has been no adjudication in this case regarding the sufficiency of the evidence to support the appellant's vehicular-homicide charge, the State can, however, reindict the appellant for vehicular homicide using the language set forth in Ex parte Edwards, supra.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“did not charge a mental state, and [was], therefore, fatally defective with respect to the vehicular-homicide charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.