In re Paul

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 2003

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2003-01-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2005

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-01-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM:

¶2AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2003, Michael G. Paul having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated June 27, 2002; the said Michael G. Paul having been directed on October 16, 2002, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

¶3ORDERED that Michael G. Paul is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.