86 N.J.L. 708
Decided October 16, 1914
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1914-10-16
<p>On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 85 N. J. L. 151.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1914-10-16
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1953
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Jnstice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh,' Black, Bogert, Vre-DBNBURGH, HePI’BNHEIMBR, WILLIAMS, JJ. 11.
¶3For reversal — None.