Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

87 N.J.L. 330

State v. Kroll

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 1, 1915

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1915-03-01

On error to the Supreme Court. The plaintiff in error was convicted in the Hudson County Quarter Sessions of the crime of carnal abuse. The judgment entered thereon was reviewed in the Supreme Court and there affirmed in a per curiam which reads as follows: “There was a conviction of carnal abuse of a female under the age of sixteen.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1932

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1915-03-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment of the court below will be affirmed for the reasons stated in its per curiam.

¶2For affirmance—Tiie Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Teri-iune, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 13. .

¶3For reversal—None.

/87/njl/330 · .json · Public domain