Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

87 N.J.L. 708

Roberson v. Crichfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 14, 1915

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1915-06-14

The issues presented by the pleadings and submitted to the jury were—first, whether or not the services for which the plaintiffs claimed compensation were rendered by them to the defendant and were within the scope of the former’s employment by the latter, and second, the reasonable value of such services as were so rendered. “The grounds of appeal, nine in number, deal wholly with alleged errors in the admission of evidence.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1918

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1915-06-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶2For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchakd, Parker, Bergen, Kalisoh, Black, Vredenburgh, White, Teehune, Heppeni-ieimer, JJ. 11.

¶3For reversal—Hone.

/87/njl/708 · .json · Public domain