90 N.J. Eq. 286
Decided February 6, 1919
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1919-02-06
residence at Brotmanville, in this state. Their married life does not seem to have been the happiest, their dispositions being the opposite of each other. I think that the complainant was of a nervous, excitable disposition and apt to take offence at slight things, while that of the defendant was sullen and moody. Their married life was quite stormy, but I cannot say that the defendant was entirely responsible for it.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1926
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1919-02-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Jolino.
¶2For affirmance — Ti-ie Oiiiee-Justtce, Swayze, Trek-chard. Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Tvaltscii, Black, Heppentieimek, Wri/r.TAMS, Gardner — 11.
¶3For reversal — Hone.