Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 968 FSUPP 549 - Davoll v. Webb

Davoll v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
July 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6621 · 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12133 (§ 203 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Frank L. SPULAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant · Dominic v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. · Virgo v. Riviera Beach Associates, Ltd. · Shore v. Federal Express Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]ithout reserving the right to request an evidentiary hearing, defense counsel agreed at the December 11, 1996 status conference that the equitable relief issues would be addressed on the basis of the parties' written submissions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an award of front pay to each Private Plaintiff in the amount calculated by Dr. Vogenthaler from 1997 through 1999, a period of two years, will allow each a reasonable amount of time to find comparable employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “ha[d] made no showing that a hearing is justified nor that it would change the outcome concerning the equitable relief issues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.