Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

contempt

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 289 U.S. 1 - Clark v. United States · 1933Most cited · 1,637 citing opinions

juror on voir dire

Concealment or misstatement by a juror upon a voir dire examination is punishable as a contempt if its tendency and design are to obstruct the processes of justice.

How the Supreme Court has restated “contempt”

19331940195019601962 most cited: 289 U.S. 1 - Clark v. United States (1933)
first stateddeparted

Each Supreme Court definition of “contempt,” sized by how often later courts cited it. “Change” is measured by wording overlap with earlier definitions — a rough signal, not a semantic judgment.

How often courts cite the cases defining “contempt”

1930194019601980200020202030467

Court decisions citing the 3 opinions that defined “contempt” — 2,461 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining cases as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.

All 3 definitions, chronological · 1933–1962

  1. The dual function of contempt has long been recognized—(1) vindication of the public interest by punishment of contemptuous conduct; (2) coercion to compel the contemnor to do what the law requires of him.

  2. [P]rocedural due process requires that one charged with contempt of court be advised of the charges against him, have a reasonable opportunity to meet them by way of defense or explanation, have the right to be represented by counsel, and have a chance to testify and call other witnesses in his behalf, either by way of defense or explanation.

    procedural due process