City
Section, Alabama
167,964 opinions mention this place
Section is a town in Jackson County, Alabama, United States and is included in the Huntsville-Decatur Combined Statistical Area. As of the 2000 census, the population of the town is 769. Section is located on top of Sand Mountain. It is also home to the Section Dairy Bar.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Section
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)542 U.S. 507
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Guy Mitchells v. Mary L Helms (2000)530 U.S. 793
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Stenberg v. Carhart (2000)530 U.S. 914
- United States v. Morrison (2000)529 U.S. 598
- Saenz v. Roe (1999)526 U.S. 489
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York (1997)521 U.S. 203
- Vacco v. Quill (1997)521 U.S. 793
- Reno v. ACLU (1997)521 U.S. 844
- City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)521 U.S. 507
- Romer v. Evans (1996)517 U.S. 620
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996)517 U.S. 44
- United States v. Gaudin (1995)515 U.S. 506
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Hubbard v. United States (1995)514 U.S. 695
- J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994)511 U.S. 127
- United States v. Dixon (1993)509 U.S. 688
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota (1992)504 U.S. 298overruled
Find legal help in Section
Practice-area guides and local resources for Section, Alabama.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Alabama
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Grant · 113,841
- York · 90,882
- Jones · 51,450
- Columbia · 42,186
- Anderson · 40,158
- Range · 38,204
- Jackson · 37,434
- Black · 31,682
- Normal · 28,679
- Douglas · 24,968
- Kansas · 18,795
- Enterprise · 18,004
- Campbell · 17,376
- Kennedy · 17,180
- Morris · 17,030
- Jack · 15,524
- Houston · 15,076
- Ward · 13,609
- Hamilton · 13,498
- Gordon · 12,587
- Valley · 12,526
- Chapman · 12,416
- Reform · 12,180
- Banks · 11,530
Opinions mentioning Section
- 563 F2D 1240Allen v. Aetna Life Insurance
- 563 F2D 1231Meadows v. Gabrel
- 563 F2D 1220Carrasco-Favela v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- 563 F2D 1121United States v. Solomon
- 563 F2D 1172Bayou Landing, Ltd. v. Watts
- 563 F2D 1103Riddle v. Exxon Transportation Co.
- 563 F2D 1057Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross
- 563 F2D 1099Peroff v. Hylton
- 563 F2D 1043Maine v. Kreps
- 563 F2D 1008United States v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.
- 563 F2D 1052Maine v. Kreps
- 562 F2D 933Spring Construction Co. v. Harris
- 562 F2D 914Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. Mathews
- 562 F2D 91Cabrera v. Municipality of Bayamon
- 562 F2D 889Denicola v. G. C. Murphy Co.
- 562 F2D 880Glus v. G. C. Murphy Co.
- 562 F2D 870Paeco, Inc., in No. 76-1495 v. Applied Moldings, Inc. And Michael R. Sigal, in No. 76-1496 v. Arlen Realty and Development Corp
- 562 F2D 866Katris v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- 562 F2D 84Hadfield v. Mitre Corp.
- 562 F2D 831Swasey v. Whalen
- 562 F2D 820Collins Securities Corp. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
- 562 F2D 789United States v. Jackson
- 562 F2D 807Lubrizol Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency
- 562 F2D 772Harris v. Bell
- 562 F2D 749Warner-Lambert Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
- 562 F2D 744Pealo v. Farmers Home Administration of United States Department of Agriculture
- 562 F2D 729Smith v. Saxbe
- 562 F2D 701Mazaleski v. Treusdell
- 562 F2D 70Wadsworth v. Whaland
- 562 F2D 664Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Federal Power Commission
- 562 F2D 65United States v. Kehoe
- 562 F2D 649United States v. Johnson
- 562 F2D 645McGovern Plaza Joint Venture v. First of Denver Mortgage Investors
- 562 F2D 633United States v. Martinez
- 562 F2D 615United States v. Calloway
- 562 F2D 607California Dump Truck Owners Association, Inc. v. Associated General Contractors Of America, San Diego Chapter, Inc.
- 562 F2D 561Bradwell v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
- 562 F2D 550Ferdinand D. Wharton, Jr. v. Frances N. Knefel
- 562 F2D 532T. L. Hunt, Inc. Of Texas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Chester Patterson, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Hunt Dry Goods Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Hunt's Grand Plaza, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Hunt's of Phoenix Village, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- 562 F2D 476United States v. Richardson
- 562 F2D 453United States v. Smith
- 562 F2D 459United States v. Akin
- 562 F2D 446Austin v. Board of Education of Georgetown Community Unit School District No. 3 of Vermilion County
- 562 F2D 440Jones v. Wisconsin
- 562 F2D 427United States v. Schwartz
- 562 F2D 399United States v. Ilacqua
- 562 F2D 38Local 810, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board
- 562 F2D 38National Labor Relations Board v. Local 259, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
- 562 F2D 361United States v. Tate
- 562 F2D 351Gaudet v. Exxon Corp.