City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 52 F1D 428Northern Pac. R. Co. v. City of Spokane
- 84 F1D 200Lawrence v. Flatboat
- 65 F1D 492United States v. McSorley
- 68 F1D 526Wheeler v. City of Chicago
- 40 F1D 726Jenkins v. Trager
- 85 F1D 964Morris European & American Exp. Co. v. United States
- 41 F1D 396United States v. The Sadie
- 50 F1D 368Claiborne v. Waddell
- 70 F1D 797Denty v. The Martin Dallman
- 70 F1D 370Allen v. Southern California Ry. Co.
- 23 F1D 430Stachelberg v. Ponce
- 31 F1D 755St. Louis & St. Paul Packet Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.
- 67 F1D 331Van Orden v. Mayor of Nashville
- 89 F1D 978Noel v. Ellis
- 53 F1D 790Knox Rock-Blasting Co. v. Drake
- 77 F1D 181Walter Baker & Co. v. Baker
- 49 F1D 846United States v. Bardenheier
- 72 F1D 283Carpenter v. Ritscher
- 26 F1D 411Railway Register Manuf'g Co. v. North Hudson Co. R.
- 63 F1D 1003Cuervo v. Landauer
- 39 F1D 103Slaight v. Hedden
- 85 F1D 236McLean v. City of Macon
- 64 F1D 375Travers v. American Cordage Co.
- 38 F1D 922Leonard v. White's Golden Lubricator Co.
- 61 F1D 1012Eustrom v. The City of Naples
- 50 F1D 87Actiebolaget Separator v. Sharpless
- 64 F1D 841Pillsbury v. Pillsbury Washburn Flour Mills Co.
- 90 F1D 815Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme Pasteur v. Allen
- 50 F1D 106Rochester Coach Lace Co. v. Schaefer
- 82 F1D 665The Colima
- 60 F1D 161City of Detroit v. Detroit City Ry. Co.
- 55 F1D 481Smith v. Stewart
- 63 F1D 445Werckmeister v. Pierce & Bushnell Manuf'g Co.
- 41 F1D 788Innis v. Oil City Boiler Works
- 35 F1D 351Kidd v. Greenwich Ins.
- 72 F1D 282Burger v. Moonlight
- 48 F1D 875Central Trust Co. of New York v. Marietta & N. G. Ry. Co.
- 12 F1D 707Shaw Stocking Co. v. Mack
- 58 F1D 620Sanford v. Gregg
- 93 F1D 931St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co.
- 11 F1D 763The Henry Frank
- 39 F1D 781Taft v. Stephens Lithographing & Engraving Co.
- 31 F1D 855Suess v. Noble
- 78 F1D 411Roberts v. Brooks
- 87 F1D 727MacColl v. Knowles Loom Works
- 33 F1D 366Mather v. Jarel
- 75 F1D 519Pacific Trading Co. v. United States
- 46 F1D 426Finance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Charleston, C. & C. R.