City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 72 F1D 993Quinn v. Dimond
- 51 F1D 191United States ex rel. United States Attorney v. 9 Casks & Packages of Distilled Spirits
- 14 F1D 728Clemens v. Belford, Clark & Co.
- 40 F1D 584Heysinger v. Rouss
- 66 F1D 831Coles v. Northrup
- 70 F1D 1012Illinois Steel Co. v. Kilmer Manuf'g Co.
- 70 F1D 455Doe v. Waterloo Min. Co.
- 30 F1D 195Merritt v. One Package of Merchandise
- 87 F1D 72Bosworth v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
- 80 F1D 596Niblack v. Cosler
- 88 F1D 896Larrowe-Loisette v. O'Loughlin
- 49 F1D 177Rycroft v. Green
- 43 F1D 362Montgomery v. Township of St. Mary's
- 42 F1D 15Furguson v. Hamlin
- 78 F1D 482Sessler v. Borchardt
- 71 F1D 567Ruby v. Atkinson
- 82 F1D 757Canada Sugar-Refining Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America
- 21 F1D 109Mack v. Sloteman
- 71 F1D 739Egbert v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.
- 60 F1D 159Gunn v. Black
- 80 F1D 352Western North Carolina Land Co. v. Scaife
- 56 F1D 499Smith v. Walton
- 11 F1D 801Bassett v. Malone
- 60 F1D 803Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Northern Pac. R.
- 31 F1D 453Brown Chemical Co. v. Myer
- 70 F1D 15Mitchell v. Northern Pac. R.
- 44 F1D 631Kelly v. The Topsy
- 70 F1D 613Feder v. Benkert
- 64 F1D 890Kalt v. The Kenilworth
- 52 F1D 169Wold v. Keyser
- 45 F1D 212New York & R. Cement Co. v. Coplay Cement Co.
- 95 F1D 172The St. Georg
- 64 F1D 687London & San Francisco Bank v. Parke & Lacy Machinery Co.
- 68 F1D 425Hendricks v. Schmidt
- 64 F1D 133Office Specialty Manuf'g Co. v. Cooke
- 40 F1D 154Hat-Sweat Manuf'g Co. v. Davis S. M. Co.
- 19 F1D 78Crœsus Mining, Milling & Smelting Co. v. Colorado Land & Mineral Co.
- 44 F1D 470Cincinnati South. R. v. Chattanooga Electric Street-Railway Co.
- 31 F1D 492La Compania Bilbaina de Navigacion de Bilbao v. Spanish-American Light & Power Co.
- 16 F1D 874The Geneva
- 45 F1D 494Clowes v. The Frank & Willie
- 77 F1D 126Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Friel
- 64 F1D 417Eells v. Ross
- 32 F1D 113Sherwood v. Roundtree
- 71 F1D 695Kaiserbrauerei, Beck & Co. v. J. & P. Baltz Brewing Co.
- 58 F1D 497Evans v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.
- 66 F1D 53Henderson v. United States
- 85 F1D 637Pittsburgh Crushed-Steel Co. v. Diamond Steel Co.
- 89 F1D 1019National Harrow Co. v. North Molitor Mfg. Co.