City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 103 F3D 133Skolnick v. Doria
- 103 F3D 1293Pitsonbarger v. Gramley
- 103 F3D 130Willie E. Peale, Jr. v. Mark T. Miller, Trustee Betty Cummins, Creditor And, Charles Cummins, Creditor
- 103 F3D 129Adam R. Houser v. Mark H. Luttrell J.M. Brown Donald Clair
- 103 F3D 122United States v. Williams
- 103 F3D 122United States v. Darrell W. Samuel
- 103 F3D 122United States v. Robert Newsome, A/K/A Nu Nu
- 103 F3D 121United States v. Byron Andrew Green
- 103 F3D 121United States v. Hunter
- 103 F3D 121United States v. McTeer
- 103 F3D 121United States v. A Lucas
- 103 F3D 120Ss Lc Group Incorporated v. The Ryland Group Incorporated
- 103 F3D 1180Young v. Federal Deposit Insurance
- 103 F3D 117James Gransby v. D. Swisher R.L. Lucas L.M. Saunders
- 103 F3D 117Hall's Reclamation, Incorporated v. Apac Carolina, Inc.
- 103 F3D 116Cox v. Hathaway III
- 103 F3D 1140In re Grand Jury
- 103 F3D 114United States v. Teodoro A. Ando U.S. v. Amyrellis L. Ando
- 103 F3D 112Mark Eugene Janiec v. Nestor Guzman
- 103 F3D 1027City of Los Angeles Department of Airports v. United States Department of Transportation
- 103 F3D 1093United States v. Leslie
- 102 F3D 999United States v. Cal-Almond Inc.
- 102 F3D 96Carver v. Foerster
- 102 F3D 928United States v. Molina
- 102 F3D 609California Forestry Ass'n v. United States Forest Service
- 102 F3D 56Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co.
- 102 F3D 494Slagle v. ITT Hartford
- 102 F3D 1524Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach
- 102 F3D 1440United States v. Beasley
- 102 F3D 1120United States v. Brazel
- 102 F3D 1005National Labor Relations Board v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.
- 102 F3D 1United States v. Lombard
- 101 F3D 993United States v. Neal
- 101 F3D 772American Portland Cement Alliance v. Environmental Protection Agency
- 101 F3D 705Borders v. Smucker
- 101 F3D 702Fingers v. Jackson-Madison County General Hospital District
- 101 F3D 696United States v. Reavis
- 101 F3D 695Briles v. Surratt
- 101 F3D 695O'Neal v. Merkel
- 101 F3D 692US v. P
- 101 F3D 691William Mundy v. Ara Food Mark Service, Brian Keith, Schroek, Mr., Kimberly, Mr., F. Butts, Mrs
- 101 F3D 686Norbert Rivera v. United States
- 101 F3D 684Sunenblick v. Harrell
- 101 F3D 684Belmonts v. Dimucci
- 101 F3D 683Vincent J. Catalfo v. United States