City
California, Maryland
64,998 opinions mention this place
California is a census-designated place and community in St. Mary's County, Maryland, United States. The population was 9,307 at the 2000 census. California continues to grow with the spread of population out from the older adjacent community of Lexington Park and the growth in both technology-related and defense-related jobs at the Patuxent River Naval Air Station. There are department stores and numerous shopping centers situated along Maryland Highway 235 ("Three Notch Road"). Maryland Route 4 crosses Highway 235 in California, providing access to the wide Governor Thomas Johnson Bridge and the popular weekend resort town of Solomons, Maryland on the opposite side. Bridge-bound traffic is infamous for backing up during rush hour.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving California
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Crawford v. Washington (2004)541 U.S. 36
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- United States v. Hatter (2001)532 U.S. 557
- Stenberg v. Carhart (2000)530 U.S. 914
- United States v. Morrison (2000)529 U.S. 598
- Saenz v. Roe (1999)526 U.S. 489
- Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York (1997)521 U.S. 203
- Reno v. ACLU (1997)521 U.S. 844
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996)517 U.S. 44
- Romer v. Evans (1996)517 U.S. 620
- Hubbard v. United States (1995)514 U.S. 695
- United States v. Gaudin (1995)515 U.S. 506
- Godinez v. Moran (1993)509 U.S. 389
- R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)505 U.S. 377
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota (1992)504 U.S. 298overruled
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992)505 U.S. 1003
- California v. Acevedo (1991)500 U.S. 565
Find legal help in California
Practice-area guides and local resources for California, Maryland.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Maryland
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Issue · 238,637
- Secretary · 47,227
- Price · 43,158
- Columbia · 42,184
- Accident · 31,540
- Allen · 29,475
- Street · 24,972
- Arnold · 16,134
- Baltimore · 13,309
- Henderson · 12,702
- Frederick · 10,570
- Butler · 9,314
- Avenue · 9,264
- Jefferson · 7,907
- Chase · 7,328
- Madison · 6,213
- Brooklyn · 6,023
- Baldwin · 5,386
- Phoenix · 5,195
- Helen · 4,169
- Newark · 4,065
- Clinton · 3,658
- Benson · 3,600
- Chester · 3,564
Opinions mentioning California
- 106 F3D 424In Re Resmed Limited
- 98 F3D 1356In Re Actel Corporation
- 967 F2D 597In Re Andre Brigham Young
- 52 F3D 343In Re the Regents of the University of California
- 972 F2D 1352In Re Video Processing Technology
- 930 F2D 37In Re Miu Automation Corporation
- 91 F3D 170In Re Sharper Image Corporation
- 810 F2D 194In Re Lou Patton-Bey
- 105 F3D 659In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum
- 104 F3D 375In Re Jenoptik Ag
- 946 F2D 884In Re John Rodgers Burnley
- 99 F3D 933United States v. Troescher
- 99 F3D 937Cost Management Services, Inc. v. Washington Natural Gas Co.
- 99 F3D 904Betz v. Federal Deposit Insurance
- 99 F3D 928Osorio v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
- 99 F3D 66Cathedral of the Incarnation in the Diocese of Long Island v. Garden City Co.
- 99 F3D 72Burnett v. Physician's Online, Inc.
- 99 F3D 490Gonzalez-Garcia v. Williamson Dickie Manufacturing Co.
- 99 F3D 469Koonce v. Pepe
- 99 F3D 426United States v. Donato
- 99 F3D 334Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. v. Kantor
- 99 F3D 340Moreno Roofing Co. v. Nagle
- 99 F3D 321Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson
- 99 F3D 299Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Frankwell Bullion Ltd.
- 99 F3D 181Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
- 99 F3D 194Samantha Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville and Bush-Quayle '92 Committee, Inc.
- 99 F3D 1504Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.
- 99 F3D 1495United States v. Tei Fu Chen
- 99 F3D 1466Smith v. City of Des Moines
- 99 F3D 1381Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, Inc.
- 99 F3D 108Matteson v. Ryder System Inc.
- 99 F3D 1056Vining v. Runyon
- 98 F3D 904Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. NBD Bank, N.A.
- 98 F3D 808United States of v. Wells
- 98 F3D 564Atlantic Richfield Co. v. American Airlines, Inc.
- 98 F3D 496William Ardary v. Aetna Health Plans Of California, Inc.
- 98 F3D 268Faigin v. Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
- 98 F3D 258United States v. Graves
- 98 F3D 1506United States v. Rohrig
- 98 F3D 1350United States v. Behrens
- 98 F3D 1350United States v. Burkins
- 98 F3D 1345Colvin v. O'Connor
- 98 F3D 1345Garcia v. Gomez
- 98 F3D 1262Dodger's Bar & Grill, Inc. v. Johnson County Board of County Commissioners
- 98 F3D 1213United States v. Pretty
- 98 F3D 1212Moorefield v. Commissioner
- 98 F3D 1170Mallott & Peterson v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
- 98 F3D 1133Securities & Exchange Commission v. American Capital Investments, Inc.
- 98 F3D 1109L'anza Research International, Inc. v. Quality King Distributors, Inc.