15 U.S.C. § 1692N
Section 1692n · Relation to State laws
This is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Amended 1 time on record
Applied in 65 court decisions — leading case LeBlanc v. Unifund CCR Partners (2010)
Most recently applied in Aargon Agency, Inc. v. Sandy O'Laughlin (June 2023)
This subchapter does not annul, alter, or affect, or exempt any person subject to the provisions of this subchapter from complying with the laws of any State with respect to debt collection practices, except to the extent that those laws are inconsistent with any provision of this subchapter, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. For purposes of this section, a State law is not inconsistent with this subchapter if the protection such law affords any consumer is greater than the protection provided by this subchapter.