Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

15 U.S.C. § 1803

Section 1803 · Antitrust exemptions

Amended 1 time on record

Applied in 22 court decisions — leading case Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co. (2005)

Most recently applied in NEWS+MEDIA CAPITAL GRP. LLC VS. LAS VEGAS SUN, INC. (September 2021)

How often courts cite this section

1970198019902000201020212091-353enacted · 1970 · 91-353Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.leading · 2005 · Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year.Markers show enactment, consequential amendments, and circuit splits over this section — watch for a citation surge after a change or a disagreement. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(a) Joint operating arrangements entered into prior to July 24, 1970

It shall not be unlawful under any antitrust law for any person to perform, enforce, renew, or amend any joint newspaper operating arrangement entered into prior to July 24, 1970, if at the time at which such arrangement was first entered into, regardless of ownership or affiliations, not more than one of the newspaper publications involved in the performance of such arrangement was likely to remain or become a financially sound publication: Provided, That the terms of a renewal or amendment to a joint operating arrangement must be filed with the Department of Justice and that the amendment does not add a newspaper publication or newspaper publications to such arrangement.

(b) Written consent for future joint operating arrangements

It shall be unlawful for any person to enter into, perform, or enforce a joint operating arrangement, not already in effect, except with the prior written consent of the Attorney General of the United States. Prior to granting such approval, the Attorney General shall determine that not more than one of the newspaper publications involved in the arrangement is a publication other than a failing newspaper, and that approval of such arrangement would effectuate the policy and purpose of this chapter.

(c) Predatory practices not exempt

Nothing contained in the chapter shall be construed to exempt from any antitrust law any predatory pricing, any predatory practice, or any other conduct in the otherwise lawful operations of a joint newspaper operating arrangement which would be unlawful under any antitrust law if engaged in by a single entity. Except as provided in this chapter, no joint newspaper operating arrangement or any party thereto shall be exempt from any antitrust law.

Editorial notes U.S. Code · Office of the Law Revision Counsel

References in Text

Any antitrust law, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), are the antitrust laws defined in section 1802 of this title.

/15/usc/1803 · .json · Public domain