Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 U.S.C. § 3297

Section 3297 · Cases involving DNA evidence

Amended 2 times on record

Applied in 9 court decisions — leading case United States v. Hagler (2012)

Most recently applied in United States v. Diosme Fernandez Hano (April 2019)

How often courts cite this section

20042010201920108-405enacted · 2004 · 108-405109-162amended · 2006 · 109-162United States v. Haglerleading · 2012 · United States v. Hagler
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year.Markers show enactment, consequential amendments, and circuit splits over this section — watch for a citation surge after a change or a disagreement. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

In a case in which DNA testing implicates an identified person in the commission of a felony, no statute of limitations that would otherwise preclude prosecution of the offense shall preclude such prosecution until a period of time following the implication of the person by DNA testing has elapsed that is equal to the otherwise applicable limitation period.

Editorial notes U.S. Code · Office of the Law Revision Counsel

Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–162 struck out “except for a felony offense under chapter 109A,” before “no statute of limitations”.

Effective Date

Pub. L. 108–405, title II, §204(c), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2271, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply to the prosecution of any offense committed before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this section [Oct. 30, 2004] if the applicable limitation period has not yet expired.”

/18/usc/3297 · .json · Public domain