Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 U.S.C. § 2106

Section 2106 · Procedures encouraged where not required

This is § 7 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act

Amended 1 time on record

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Cashman v. Dolce International/Hartford, Inc. (2004)

Most recently applied in James v. Truland Group, Inc. (In re Truland Group, Inc.) (November 2014)

How often courts cite this section

1988199020002010201410100-379enacted · 1988 · 100-379Cashman v. Dolce International/Hartford, Inc.leading · 2004 · Cashman v. Dolce International/Hartford, Inc.
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year.Markers show enactment, consequential amendments, and circuit splits over this section — watch for a citation surge after a change or a disagreement. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

It is the sense of Congress that an employer who is not required to comply with the notice requirements of section 2102 of this title should, to the extent possible, provide notice to its employees about a proposal to close a plant or permanently reduce its workforce.

/29/usc/2106 · .json · Public domain