10 U.S. 51 - Young v. Grundy — 10 U.S. 51

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1957 · most notably Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger (1955), Forgay v. Conrad (1848)

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1No writ of error or appeallies to an injunction.

¶2if the answer neither admits ^legations of v™d on the Inai hearing; but ot'°1<i'¡ssoíuit¡on ofan injunction ®0t0 true,

¶3THIS was an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the circuit court of the district of Columbia, dissolving an injunction. ■

¶4E. J. Lee, for the appellant.

¶5The. decree dissolves the injunction with costs j which is a final decree as to the costs. 2 Wash. 200. Davenport v. Mason.

¶6The material facts of the bill are not denied nor admitted by the answer j they are, therefore, to be taken as true. . The court below must, therefore, have proceeded on the ground that the original equity between the maker ánd payee of the note did affect the endorsee.

¶7Marshall, Ch. J.

¶8If the.answer neither admits nor denies the allegations of the bill, they must be proved upon the final hearing. Upon a question of dissolution of an injunction they are to be taken to be true.

¶9But the court has no doubt upon the question.

¶10 *52No appeal, or writ of error will lie to an interlocutory decree dissolving an injunction. .

¶11Writ of error dismissed with costs.