OpenJurist › Volume 336 › U.S. › Page 907 336 U.S. 907
Taylor v. Dennis Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1949-02-07
1 counsel of record
Relies on Taylor v. State of Alabama
Good law ✅ — No negative treatment on record how we know
Decided 1949-02-07
How this case has been cited Cited by 26 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1987 · most notably Frazier v. United States (1948), Brown v. United States (1966)
19 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
15 0 1949 1950 1960 1970 1980 decided Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 February 7, 1949.
¶2 Per Curiam Decision.
¶3 Nesbitt Elmore argued the cause for petitioner. With *908 him on the brief were Thurgood Marshall, Frank D. Reeves and Franklin H. Williams. A. A. Carmichael, Attorney General of Alabama, and Bernard F. Sykes, Assistant Attorney General, submitted on brief for respondent.
¶4 *907 Per Curiam:
¶5 The judgment and order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama and the order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit are affirmed by an equally divided Court . Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
¶6 *908 [See 335 U. S. 252 .]
Download
Copy
Embed on your site
iframe Markdown Preview card Button Hover to preview · click to copy the code
Case posture Cross reference [See 335 U. S. 252.] Source: CourtListener
Counsel Nesbitt Elmore argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Thurgood Marshall, Frank D. Reeves and Franklin H. Williams. A. A. Carmichael, Attorney General of Alabama, and Bernard F. Sykes, Assistant Attorney General, submitted on brief for respondent. In the law dictionary Defined terms used in this case
/336/us/907 · .json · Public domain 