Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 So. 2d 276 - State v. Williams

520 So. 2d 276 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
6
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Glaubius v. State (1997), In the Interest of L.A.D. v. State (1993)

80 state decisions

5901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 509 So. 2d 268 - Streeter v. Sullivan · 287 So. 2d 1 - State v. Egan · 472 So. 2d 737 - JSH v. State · 505 So. 2d 478 - Williams v. State · 479 So. 2d 146 - Bowling v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Was the damage or loss for which restitution is ordered caused directly or indirectly by the defendant's offense? 2. Is there a significant relationship between the damage to the victim and the crime proved?”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Glaubius v. State · House v. State
  2. “should work in conjunction with the causation required by the statute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Triplett v. State · 559 So. 2d 1274 - Arling v. State
  3. “Here there had been no determination that Williams caused the damages. It is clear that they were not caused by her leaving the scene of an accident. The only damages for which Williams may be ordered to pay restitution are those caused directly or indirectly by the act of leaving the scene of an accident. (Emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Longshore v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.